The man famous for his depictions of the Republican party and George W. Bush brings yet another pro-Democratic movie to the mainstream, this time trying to encourage what he sees as the laziest demographic to vote at the 2004 US Election.
Having created huge controversy the world over for his highly critical pieces Fahrenheit 9/11 and Bowling for Columbine, Slack Uprising is Michael Moore's 2007 effort.
His belief and biggest concern about the voting system is that young adults and college students, allowed to vote from the age of 18, do not care enough to show up to voting booths and register their decision on who should run the country.
Whilst the idea of filming this process is interesting in theory, it does not transfer well to the big screen. The film's introduction tells us what we already know, that Moore's effort were not enough to ensure Bush's reign in the White House would come to an end. In that sense, the film is pointless because the audience already knows the outcome and many couldn't care less about the campaigning.
The other aspect, however, is the way in which Moore evokes a sense of purpose in the would-be voters across the USA. His aim is to tour the country, visiting low-key back alley states who would never otherwise be covered by the mainstream news, as well as the heavyweight states such as Ohio and Florida, which have decided many an election.
The opportunity to experience on screen the masses that attend these rallies and deafening applause from each set of voters is incredible and gives an idea of just how much support the Democrats were accruing as the campaign progressed, although many would doubt whether everyone involved would actually vote, as nothing is set in stone by this point.
Moore hints upon sentimental areas, such as the right to free speech and the killing of four students by Nation Guard soldiers, who were sent to disperse students protesting the invasion of Cambodia, at Kent State University, Ohio. With respect to these acknowledgements, the film certainly touches on pressing issues, such as the way the government responds to opposition and the way unjust action is taken against those who, in this case, are protesting unarmed. Thankfully, this does not happen anymore.
Politics aside, Moore's select editing of the campaign footage is at times misleading and manipulated as one would expect. Interviews with pro-Bush voters are edited to have them appear unintelligent and/or downright idiotic. Later in the film, we are introduced to the Bush voters who sneak into the rallies and have to be removed due to being a disturbance. These scenes are only mentioned later in the film as if it is an emerging problem, and not a constant hassle which I found strange, and slightly questionable
Slacker Uprising certainly serves its purpose; it demonstrates just why a Democracy should work and why the ability to vote is a human right and justifiably so. However, it is horribly disjointed in places, and doesn't always feel fluid as a production.
6/10